Why the May 2016 elections failed to prove the effectiveness of the PCC model of accountability

9th May 2016Professor Michael Rowe - Northumbria University

Professor Michael Rowe reviews the 2016 PCC Elections and argues that despite a higher turnout and mandate, the PCC model of police accountability still has much to prove.

To read this article you need to have an individual paid subscription or subscriber access via your organisation’s corporate subscription.

Please sign in to your account or subscribe to a plan below to read this article.

If your organisation has a corporate subscription please register a FREE account with your organisation email address for full subscriber access.

Email Address or Username:

Password:

Forgot password?

Having problems creating an account or can't sign in? Please e-mail [email protected]

Username: *

Email Address: *

Verify Email Address: *

Captcha: *

A registration to Policing Insight also registers you for access to sister site PolicingTV.

Receive the Policing Insight Weekly Digest Receive the Policing Insight Daily Brief (powered by Media Monitor) I would like to receive information and offers from carefully selected partners of Policing Insight and PolicingTV

Having problems creating an account or can't sign in? Please e-mail [email protected]

Premium Subscription (Annual)

All Articles
Reports
Media Monitor
All PolicingTV Videos
Newsletters (Access all content)

£600 per year

Articles Only Subscription (Annual)

All Articles
Reports
Media Monitor
All PolicingTV Videos
Newsletters (Access all Policing Insight content)

£200 per 12 months

Why the May 2016 elections failed to prove the effectiveness of the PCC model of accountability

Request a password reset using the form below