At vaccine mandate protests in Canberra last week, police used powerful loud-hailing devices called Long-Range Acoustic Devices (LRADs) to address protesters.
The claims highlight the importance of understanding new policing and crowd-control technologies such as LRADs, and how they are used.
While some protesters claimed they were injured by the ‘sonic weapon’, those reports are inconsistent with what an LRAD can really do. However, the claims highlight the importance of understanding new policing and crowd-control technologies such as LRADs, and how they are used.
The LRAD is a device that can put out a highly directional ‘beam’ of incredibly loud sound, up to 160 decibels (dB).
To understand how loud 160dB is, it’s important to understand that volume, or ‘sound pressure level’ (SPL), is not a linear measure: an increase of 10dB actually corresponds to a 10-fold increase in SPL. A 20dB increase would be a 100-fold increase in SPL.
As a rough reference, standing directly behind a jet engine as it takes off is between 130-140dB, and a nearby gunshot rates at approximately 150db. Anything over 140dB will cause pain for most people, but even sounds over 120dB can cause permanent hearing damage from even short periods of exposure.
The history of the LRAD
The origin of the LRAD can be traced to an event in October 2000, when the USS Cole, an American guided missile destroyer, was bombed by a small boat loaded with explosives in a terrorist attack.
As the small vessel approached, naval personnel on board the USS Cole were unable to successfully hail it. By the time they were confident their messages could be heard, it was too late.
This incident resulted in numerous changes in naval policy, and it also led to the creation of the LRAD. Since that time, the technology has proliferated, aided by a dedicated effort from its creators to make the item a staple device for communication and increasingly for crowd control in military and civil settings.
The LRAD’s siren is one of its main deterrents. It is specially designed to be weighted to transmit sound loaded in the frequency range where human hearing is most sensitive, roughly 2,000-4,000 Hertz. This design simultaneously ensures maximum discomfort for the target subject and maximum efficiency of the device itself.
What makes the power of the LRAD significant is its capacity to cause long-term physiological damage to the body. In September 2009 a US woman named Karen Piper suffered permanent hearing damage when she was accidentally caught within an extended period of loud emissions from an LRAD operator.
This resulted in a successful lawsuit against the City of Pittsburgh that was significant and historic, as it recognised that sound can be weaponised and cause lasting bodily harm.
LRADs in Australia
Until very recently, the use of the LRAD in public settings in Australia has been largely non-existent. Most use by police forces in Australia has been limited to disaster communication and for communication during events such as hostage situations.
In 2020, however, this pattern of usage began to shift. In June 2020, during the Black Lives Matters protests in New South Wales, police deployed the LRAD, in a move that significantly shifted the way the technology could be used in Australia.
NSW Police have responded to "social media commentary" about the use of a Long Range Acoustic Device, saying in a press conference that "it was a normal loud-hailer." @9NewsSyd pic.twitter.com/oOFfPX3WuP
— andrew rickert (@_rockrit) June 12, 2020
Most recently, in response to the protesters gathered in Canberra and assembled on Parliament House’s lawn earlier this month, the LRAD was again deployed. In this case, it was used as a ‘loud hailer’ for voice messages to be passed to those assembled for the vaccine mandate protests. It’s unclear exactly how loud the messages were, but there’s no evidence the devices were used in ‘siren mode’.
After its use, there were a series of posts and reports on various outlets regarding purported injuries from the use of the device. These speculative injuries are in no way consistent with how the device operates, or how it is reported to have been used.
There is no question that if used to its full potential, the LRAD can cause significant damage to auditory nerves. However, unlike what the protesters reported, beyond the auditory system, the device does not harm the body.
Many reports seem to conflate the LRAD, sometimes called a ‘sound cannon’, with other devices for crowd control such as the Active Denial System. Rather than sound, this uses millimetre-wave radiation to cause the nerve receptors in the upper layer of skin to feel an incredible heat via dielectric heating.
A quick scan of coverage and social media following the use of the LRAD this past week reveals a lot of anxiety about its use in public settings. There is also plenty of misinformation and disinformation circulating about how it operates and what the LRAD technology is actually capable of doing.
More sound and energy-based control devices are on their way – one recent invention is the ‘speech jamming’ Acoustic Hailing And Disruption (AHAD) device. It’s important to recognise the actual implications of these technologies, and to talk about how, when and where they are to be used.
About the Author
Lawrence English is a composer, artist and curator based in Brisbane. Working across an array of aesthetic investigations, English’s work explores the politics of perception and prompts questions of field, agency and memory. English utilises a variety of approaches including visceral live performance and installation to create works that ask audiences to consider the relationship to space, place and experiential embodiment. He writes on issues relating to sonic affect and the changing face of sound and listening in the 21st century.
Picture of an LRAD being used by Police in Warsaw, © Damian Pankowiec / Shutterstock